waiting to send decision to author npj

It is published online with accepted manuscripts. A description of the statistical treatment of error analysis should be included in the figure legend. Thank you for visiting nature.com. If the. Author IJ holds shares in [company name A] but and declares no non-financial competing interests. Sometimes, this can take anywhere between 2-6 weeks. Online only: Manuscripts judged to be of potential interest to our readership are sent for formal review, typically to two or three Reviewers. The corresponding author is sent proofs and is welcome to discuss changes with the Editors, but npj Precision Oncology reserves the right to make the final decision about matters of style and the size of figures. So don't worry if its taking a long time: its just how the process works. J. Nat. Reviewers agree to review the manuscript. Authors should provide a cover letter that includes the affiliation and contact information for the corresponding author. Authors AB, EF, GH declare no financial or non-financial competing interests. References are numbered sequentially as they appear in the text, methods, tables, figure legends. npj Series journals require potential referees to disclose any professional and commercial competing interests before undertaking to review a paper, and require referees not to copy papers or to circulate them to un-named colleagues. A PDF has been built, either by you or by the editor, that requires your approval to move forward. 0, 14 To do this, the corresponding author will need to: Submission to npj Precision Oncology is taken to imply that there is no significant overlap between the submitted manuscript and any other papers from the same authors under consideration or in press elsewhere. New submissions that remain Incomplete more than 90 days will be removed. Thank you for your feedback, it will help us serve you better. [CDATA[> In your 'Author Main Menu' manuscripts appear in different folders as they pass through phases in the editorial process: The submission is waiting for you to complete the submission (or revision) process. 3, :2.0 | :50.0IF=6, 52 If the funder has played no role in the research, this should be stated. In either case, the revised manuscript should be accompanied by a cover letter explaining how the manuscript has been changed, and a separate point-by-point response to referees' comments. The reporting summary will be published with all accepted manuscripts. This process may involve further consultation with the Reviewers and editor-mediated communications between the Reviewers. Provide images in RGB color and at 300 dpi or higher resolution. | figshare) and use their option to provide a private sharing link for the referees to access it. 5 months is a really long time for a paper to be under the status of "Editor Assigned". See How does the Article Transfer Service work for authors? Funding information should be placed in the Acknowledgement section. | If you are willing to add data to the paper to address the shortcomings, explain what this data is and what it shows. Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores ( ScholarOne ), reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. Revised manuscripts should be uploaded via the link provided in the Editor's decision letter. npj Parkinsons Disease . Authors may also indicate a limited number of scientists who should not review the paper. Under Creative Commons licences, authors retain copyright in their work. Code availability statements can take one of the following forms (or a combination of more than one if required): The underlying code [and training/validation datasets] for this study is available in [repository name] and can be accessed via this link [insert persistent URL to code]. Bellin, D. L. et al. The novelty of a submitted paper is considered to be compromised if it has significant conceptual overlap with a published paper or one accepted for publication by npj Vaccines. Comprehensive information on the statistical analyses used must be included in the paper. Peer review times vary per journal. For molecular dynamics trajectories, at least the initial and final configurations should be supplied. Editors need to identify, invite and get (often two or more) reviewers to agree to review. What does a status change from "Required reviews completed" back to "Under review" mean? The Editors also reserve the right to reject a paper even after it has been accepted if it becomes apparent that there are serious problems with the scientific content or with violations of our publishing policies. Send to Copyediting: This means the submission is . Use of the word "significant" should always be accompanied by a P value; otherwise, use "substantial," "considerable," etc. Manuscripts should be submitted via the online submission system: Submit manuscript. It allows for maximum dissemination and re-use of open access materials: users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit) and remix (adapt) the contribution including for commercial purposes, providing they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor. Authors must ensure that their Methods section includes adequate experimental and characterization data necessary for others in the field to reproduce their work. Figures are best prepared at the size you would expect them to appear in print. | How long one should wait on an editor's decision depends on a variety of factors - your stature within your profession, the quality of the journal to which you submitted the manuscript, and the. At publication, Nature Portfolio journals consider it best practice to release custom computer code in a way that allows readers to repeat the published results. ]]> Codes and software should be available and properly referenced in the article and/or supplementary information. The peer review process of any submission associated with a collection or special issue is handled by an Editor who is responsible for assigning at least two referees to each article and evaluating the reviews. Response to Requests for Admission . To obtain All manuscripts must be submitted via our online submission system using theSubmit manuscript link. If using a bar chart, please note that either individual data points must be overlaid on the bars or the chart must be converted to a dot-plot or box-and-whisker-plot format. Lettering in figures should be in lower-case type, with only the first letter of each label capitalized. The underlying code for this study [and training/validation datasets] is not publicly available but may be made available to qualified researchers on reasonable request from the corresponding author. 2.75, :3.0 | :50.0Manuscript Under Consideration , 2 Acceptable formats are:ai, .eps, .pdf, .ps and .svg for fully editable vector-based art; layered .psd and .tif for editable layered art; .psd, .tif, .png and .jpg for bitmap images; .ppt if fully editable and without styling effects; ChemDraw (.cdx) for chemical structures. Research articles in Life Sciences, Health Sciences, Earth and Environmental Sciences, and Social and Behavioural Sciences must include relevant details about several elements of experimental and analytical design. How to write an email to the editor inquiring about the current status of my paper? The npj Series journal Editors reserve the right to make the final decision about matters of style and the size of figures. In the event of publication, the received date is the date of submission to npj Vaccines. Research papers published by the journals represent important advances bringing new insight to a specialized area of research. Journals can customize the wording of status terms. All referees agree to these conditions before the journal sends them a manuscript to assess. We cannot offer to provide corrected reprints with higher image quality if only poor quality images were supplied at accept stage. When the Editors begin to enter a decision it will move the status to 'Decision in Process'. Alternatively, authors may choose to request a fresh review, in which case they should not use the automated transfer link, and the Editors will evaluate the paper without reference to the previous review process. March 29, 2023 [CDATA[// >

How Much Do Wip Radio Hosts Make, How To Reference An Attachment In A Memo, Articles W

waiting to send decision to author npj